sepehr/Entropyk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update project structure and configurations

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
sepehr
2026-05-23 10:19:55 +02:00
parent ab5dc7e568
commit 62efea0646
1832 changed files with 83568 additions and 51829 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
.opencode/skills/bmad-product-brief/prompts/draft-and-review.md
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
**Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}`
**Paths:** Bare paths (e.g. `agents/foo.md`) resolve from the skill root.
# Stage 4: Draft & Review
@@ -8,7 +9,7 @@
## Step 1: Draft the Executive Brief
Use `../resources/brief-template.md` as a guide — adapt structure to fit the product's story.
Use the template at `{workflow.brief_template}` as a guide — adapt structure to fit the product's story.
**Writing principles:**
- **Executive audience** — persuasive, clear, concise. 1-2 pages.
@@ -36,9 +37,9 @@ Before showing the draft to the user, run it through multiple review lenses in p
**Launch in parallel:**
1. **Skeptic Reviewer** (`../agents/skeptic-reviewer.md`) — "What's missing? What assumptions are untested? What could go wrong? Where is the brief vague or hand-wavy?"
1. **Skeptic Reviewer** (`agents/skeptic-reviewer.md`) — "What's missing? What assumptions are untested? What could go wrong? Where is the brief vague or hand-wavy?"
2. **Opportunity Reviewer** (`../agents/opportunity-reviewer.md`) — "What adjacent value propositions are being missed? What market angles or partnerships could strengthen this? What's underemphasized?"
2. **Opportunity Reviewer** (`agents/opportunity-reviewer.md`) — "What adjacent value propositions are being missed? What market angles or partnerships could strengthen this? What's underemphasized?"
3. **Contextual Reviewer** — You (the main agent) pick the most useful third lens based on THIS specific product. Choose the lens that addresses the SINGLE BIGGEST RISK that the skeptic and opportunity reviewers won't naturally catch. Examples:
- For healthtech: "Regulatory and compliance risk reviewer"
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ After all reviews complete:
## Step 4: Present to User
**Headless mode:** Skip to `finalize.md` — no user interaction. Save the improved draft directly.
**Headless mode:** Skip to `prompts/finalize.md` — no user interaction. Save the improved draft directly.
**Yolo and Guided modes:**
@@ -83,4 +84,4 @@ Present reviewer findings with brief rationale, then offer: "Want me to dig into
## Stage Complete
This stage is complete when: (a) the draft has been reviewed by all three lenses and improvements integrated, AND either (autonomous) save and route directly, or (guided/yolo) the user is satisfied. Route to `finalize.md`.
This stage is complete when: (a) the draft has been reviewed by all three lenses and improvements integrated, AND either (autonomous) save and route directly, or (guided/yolo) the user is satisfied. Route to `prompts/finalize.md`.