---
stepsCompleted: [step-01-document-discovery, step-02-prd-analysis, step-03-epic-coverage, step-04-ux-alignment, step-05-epic-quality, step-06-final-assessment]
documents:
  prd: "prd.md"
  architecture: null
  epics: null
  ux: null
  supporting:
    - "product-brief-gitpulse.md"
    - "product-brief-gitpulse-distillate.md"
    - "research/market-git-dashboard-ia-research-2026-04-24.md"
---

# Implementation Readiness Assessment Report

**Date:** 2025-04-25
**Project:** GitPulse

## PRD Analysis

### Functional Requirements

**Repository Discovery (7 requirements):**

- FR1: The user can initiate a recursive disk scan to discover Git repositories on their machine
- FR2: The user can configure which root directories to scan
- FR3: The user can exclude directories from scanning via a `.gitpulseignore` file (glob syntax)
- FR4: The system can detect Git repositories by identifying `.git` folders
- FR5: The user can manually trigger a rescan to refresh the repository list
- FR6: The system can gracefully handle inaccessible directories (skip and log, no crash)
- FR7: The system can cache scan results for instant reload on subsequent launches

**Dashboard & Visualization (7 requirements):**

- FR8: The user can view repositories in a card grid showing branch, status (clean/dirty/ahead/behind), last commit, and stash count
- FR9: The user can view repositories in a sortable, filterable list view with multi-select
- FR10: The user can toggle between card grid and list view
- FR11: The user can sort repositories by status, last activity date, branch name, or ahead/behind count
- FR12: The user can filter repositories by status (clean, dirty, ahead, behind, dormant)
- FR13: The system can display visual status indicators (color/badges) for instant pattern recognition across all repos
- FR14: The system can render large repository lists (100+) without UI degradation

**Batch Operations (7 requirements):**

- FR15: The user can select multiple repositories and execute batch `git pull`
- FR16: The user can select multiple repositories and execute batch `git push`
- FR17: The user can select multiple repositories and execute batch `git fetch`
- FR18: The user can batch `git status` across multiple repositories
- FR19: The system can report per-repo results for batch operations (success/failure with details)
- FR20: The system can handle partial success — repos that succeed continue, repos that fail are reported with error details
- FR21: The user can see specific error details (e.g., merge conflicts, auth errors) for failed repos

**Smart Status / AI Integration (9 requirements):**

- FR22: The user can enable Ollama integration for local, private repository health summaries
- FR23: The user can configure cloud API keys (Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Anthropic) for AI-powered analysis
- FR24: The system can generate one-line repository health summaries via the configured AI backend
- FR25: The system can suggest commit messages based on staged changes via the configured AI backend
- FR26: The system can detect and flag dormant repositories beyond a configurable threshold
- FR27: The user can see a visual privacy indicator showing whether data processing is local or cloud-based
- FR28: The system can operate entirely without any AI backend configured (deterministic status parsing as default)
- FR29: The user can route different AI tasks to different providers (e.g., Ollama for commits, cloud for analysis)
- FR30: The system can provide cross-repo analysis when using a cloud AI model (e.g., shared library dependencies across repos)

**System Tray Agent & Notifications (5 requirements):**

- FR31: The user can run GitPulse as a background system tray agent with the dashboard closed
- FR32: The system can monitor for remote changes and alert the user via native OS notifications
- FR33: The system can send push reminders for repos with unpushed commits older than a configurable threshold
- FR34: The user can configure GitPulse to auto-launch at system startup (opt-in)
- FR35: The user can access common operations (status, pull, push) via the system tray context menu

**Settings & Configuration (6 requirements):**

- FR36: The user can configure scan root directories via a settings interface
- FR37: The user can configure AI backend settings (Ollama endpoint, cloud API keys, per-task routing)
- FR38: The user can configure notification behavior (frequency, types, thresholds)
- FR39: The user can configure system tray agent behavior (launch at startup, monitoring interval)
- FR40: User settings are persisted locally and survive application restarts
- FR41: The user can reset all settings to defaults

**Onboarding & Distribution (5 requirements):**

- FR42: The user can launch GitPulse without any account, login, or network configuration
- FR43: The system can operate fully offline (all core features work without network access)
- FR44: The user can manually check for application updates via system tray or settings
- FR45: The user can download GitPulse as a single binary (no installer wizard required)
- FR46: The system can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux from initial release

**Total FRs: 46**

### Non-Functional Requirements

**Performance (8 requirements):**

- NFR1: Cold startup < 3 seconds
- NFR2: Disk scan speed < 5 seconds (SSD, <100 repos)
- NFR3: Memory usage < 200 MB with 50+ repos
- NFR4: Binary size ~15 MB
- NFR5: Batch operation throughput < 30 seconds (pull/push 20 repos)
- NFR6: UI rendering responsiveness < 16ms per frame (60fps)
- NFR7: Async AI loading — Smart Status does not block dashboard
- NFR8: Incremental scan reload < 1 second from cache

**Security (7 requirements):**

- NFR9: API key storage via OS keychain/secure storage, not plaintext
- NFR10: Privacy by default — no data leaves machine unless cloud backend explicitly enabled
- NFR11: Data flow transparency — visual indicator for cloud data transit
- NFR12: Scan scope control — `.gitpulseignore` exclusions enforced
- NFR13: Zero telemetry by default — opt-in only
- NFR14: Git execution isolation — malicious repo cannot compromise application
- NFR15: Dependency auditing — Rust/npm vulnerabilities checked before release

**Integration (5 requirements):**

- NFR16: Ollama version compatibility (API v1) with graceful fallback
- NFR17: Cloud API compliance — stable API versions for Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenAI, Anthropic; rate limit handling
- NFR18: Git version compatibility >= 2.20 on all platforms; clear error if missing/outdated
- NFR19: Native OS integration — platform-native tray, notifications, startup (no workarounds)
- NFR20: AI offline resilience — deterministic fallback when Ollama/cloud unavailable

**Reliability (4 requirements):**

- NFR21: Scan fault tolerance — completes even if individual directories fail
- NFR22: Batch fault tolerance — successful repos complete even when others fail
- NFR23: Crash recovery — state preserved across crashes, no reconfiguration needed
- NFR24: User data persistence — settings, scan configs, API keys survive updates

**Accessibility (3 requirements):**

- NFR25: Keyboard navigation for all core operations
- NFR26: High contrast support — status indicators distinguishable in dark/high contrast mode
- NFR27: Screen reader compatibility — ARIA markup on key dashboard components

**Total NFRs: 27**

### Additional Requirements & Constraints

**Platform-specific (Desktop App):**
- Windows x64: `.exe` portable + optional MSI, SmartScreen/code signing handling
- macOS x64 + ARM: `.dmg`, universal binary, Apple notarization
- Linux x64: `.deb` + `.AppImage` + `.rpm`
- Tauri v2: native webview per platform, Rust backend identical cross-platform
- System tray: platform-specific implementations (Windows/macOS menu bar/Linux D-Bus)
- Auto-launch: Windows Registry, macOS LaunchAgent, Linux XDG autostart

**Update strategy:**
- Manual check via system tray/settings; GitHub Releases distribution
- No forced auto-update; update check = only outbound request in local-only mode
- Code signing required: Authenticode (Win), Apple Developer + notarization (Mac), GPG (Linux)
- Post-MVP: Tauri built-in updater, delta updates

**Phased delivery constraints:**
- Phase 1 (weeks 1-6): Core MVP — scan + dashboard + batch + tray + Ollama
- Phase 1.5 (weeks 7-10): Cloud AI, dormancy, code signing, i18n framework
- Phase 2 (months 4-6): Grouping, advanced AI, file watcher, CLI companion, cloud tier
- Phase 3 (months 7-12): Dependency graph, MCP, autonomous agents, GitHub/GitLab, enterprise

**Resource constraint:** Solo developer execution (2-3 months for MVP core)

### PRD Completeness Assessment

**Strengths:**
- All 46 FRs are testable, implementation-agnostic, and clearly state WHO and WHAT
- All 27 NFRs are measurable with specific targets
- 4 user journeys provide narrative context for all capability areas
- Clear phased roadmap with must-have vs nice-to-have prioritization
- Risk mitigation tables cover technical, market, and resource risks
- Innovation areas identified with validation methods

**Minor observations:**
- FR14 ("render large repository lists 100+ without degradation") partially overlaps with NFR6 (60fps rendering) — both valid but architect should be aware of the dual coverage
- FR28 (no AI = still works) and NFR20 (AI offline resilience) express the same graceful degradation principle at different levels — intentional and correct
- Desktop App platform-specific requirements (distribution formats, code signing) are not numbered as FRs — they are implementation constraints that the architect should account for

## Epic Coverage Validation

**Status: NO EPICS DOCUMENT EXISTS**

No epics or stories document was found during document discovery. Epic coverage validation cannot be performed.

### Coverage Matrix

| FR Range | Capability Area | FRs | Epic Coverage | Status |
|----------|----------------|-----|---------------|--------|
| FR1-FR7 | Repository Discovery | 7 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR8-FR14 | Dashboard & Visualization | 7 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR15-FR21 | Batch Operations | 7 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR22-FR30 | Smart Status (AI) | 9 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR31-FR35 | System Tray & Notifications | 5 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR36-FR41 | Settings & Configuration | 6 | None | BLOCKED |
| FR42-FR46 | Onboarding & Distribution | 5 | None | BLOCKED |

### Coverage Statistics

- Total PRD FRs: 46
- FRs covered in epics: **0**
- Coverage percentage: **0%**
- Total PRD NFRs: 27
- NFRs addressed in architecture: **0** (no architecture document)

### Critical Gap: Missing Epics & Stories

All 46 functional requirements lack a traceable implementation path. No epics, user stories, or sprint-ready backlog exists. **This is the single largest blocker for implementation readiness.**

**Recommendation:** Create epics document that maps each FR to one or more user stories, organized by MVP Phase 1/1.5 priority.

## UX Alignment Assessment

### UX Document Status

**Not Found.** No UX design document exists in the project.

### UX Implied Analysis

GitPulse is a **UI-heavy desktop application** with significant visual interface requirements:

- **Card Grid View** (FR8) — compact tiles with color-coded status, branch names, ahead/behind counts
- **List View** (FR9) — sortable/filterable rows with multi-select
- **View Toggle** (FR10) — seamless switching between grid and list
- **Visual Status Indicators** (FR13) — color/badge system for pattern recognition
- **Privacy Indicator** (FR27) — visual badge for local vs cloud mode
- **System Tray** (FR31-FR35) — platform-specific tray UI with context menus
- **Settings Interface** (FR36-FR41) — configuration panels for scan roots, AI backends, notifications
- **Error Reporting** (FR19-FR21) — per-repo error display in batch operations
- **Smart Status Display** (FR24-FR26) — AI-generated summaries in dashboard

The PRD defines WHAT the UI must show (capabilities) but not HOW it should look (layout, interaction patterns, visual design, component hierarchy).

### Critical Warning: UX Design Missing

**Severity: HIGH** — A user-facing desktop application with 7 distinct UI capability areas cannot proceed to implementation without UX design. Without UX documentation:

- Developers will make ad-hoc UI decisions during implementation
- Visual consistency across Card Grid, List View, Settings, and Tray cannot be guaranteed
- The privacy indicator (FR27) — a key innovation differentiator — has no visual specification
- The "5-Second Wow" conversion moment depends entirely on visual design quality
- Platform-specific adaptations (Windows/macOS/Linux tray behavior) need UX guidance

**Recommendation:** Create UX design document covering:
1. Layout wireframes for Card Grid and List View
2. Status indicator visual language (colors, badges, icons)
3. Privacy indicator component design
4. Settings panel structure
5. System tray menu hierarchy
6. Error state and empty state designs
7. Small repo count UX (Jay's Journey — dashboard with <10 repos)

## Epic Quality Review

**Status: NO EPICS DOCUMENT EXISTS**

Epic quality review cannot be performed. No epics or stories document was found.

### Best Practices Checklist (Pre-Validation)

When epics are eventually created, the following checks should be enforced:

**Epic Structure:**
- [ ] Each epic delivers user value (not technical milestones like "Setup Tauri" or "Create Rust Backend")
- [ ] Epics are independently deployable
- [ ] No forward dependencies between epics
- [ ] Epic 1 stands completely alone

**Greenfield Considerations for GitPulse:**
- [ ] Epic 1 Story 1: Project scaffolding from Tauri starter template
- [ ] Development environment configuration (Rust toolchain, Node.js, platform-specific webview)
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline for cross-platform builds early in backlog
- [ ] No "create all database tables upfront" pattern (this project uses file-based storage, so equivalent: no "setup all configuration structures upfront")

**Specific GitPulse Quality Risks:**
- Risk of technical epics like "Tauri Integration" or "Ollama API Layer" that don't deliver user value alone
- Risk of forward dependency: Smart Status stories depending on Dashboard stories that depend on Scanner stories
- Risk of oversized stories: "Implement entire Card Grid view" is too large; should be split into tile component, status badge, grid layout, interaction handlers

### Quality Violations

**No violations to report** — no epics exist to violate standards. This section will be populated when epics are created and re-assessed.

### Remediation Guidance (For Future Epic Creation)

1. **Epic 1 should deliver:** "Users can see all their Git repositories in a visual dashboard" (FR1, FR2, FR4, FR7, FR8, FR13)
2. **Epic 2 should deliver:** "Users can perform batch operations across repositories" (FR9-FR11, FR15-FR21)
3. **Epic 3 should deliver:** "Users receive passive monitoring via system tray" (FR31-FR35)
4. **Epic 4 should deliver:** "Users get AI-powered repository insights" (FR22-FR30)
5. **Epic 5 should deliver:** "Users can configure GitPulse to their preferences" (FR3, FR5, FR36-FR41, FR42-FR44)

## Summary and Recommendations

### Overall Readiness Status

**NOT READY** — The PRD is strong and comprehensive, but three critical artifacts are missing before implementation can begin.

### Assessment Summary

| Category | Status | Detail |
|----------|--------|--------|
| PRD Quality | **STRONG** | 46 FRs + 27 NFRs, all testable and measurable. Clear vision, journeys, scope. |
| Architecture | **MISSING** | No technical architecture document exists. |
| UX Design | **MISSING** | No UX design document exists. Critical for a UI-heavy desktop app. |
| Epics & Stories | **MISSING** | 0% FR coverage. No sprint-ready backlog exists. |

### Critical Issues Requiring Immediate Action

**1. No Architecture Document (Severity: CRITICAL)**

The PRD specifies Tauri v2 + Rust + React, but no technical architecture exists to guide implementation. Without it:
- No component/module boundaries defined
- No data flow between Rust backend and React frontend specified
- No AI provider abstraction layer designed
- No cross-platform build and packaging strategy documented
- No state management approach defined

**2. No Epics & Stories (Severity: CRITICAL)**

All 46 functional requirements lack a traceable implementation path. No sprint-ready backlog exists. Zero epic coverage. Implementation cannot begin without knowing what to build first, in what order, and how stories map to FRs.

**3. No UX Design Document (Severity: HIGH)**

GitPulse has 7 distinct UI capability areas. The "5-Second Wow" conversion moment depends entirely on visual design quality. The privacy indicator (a key differentiator) has no visual specification. Developers will make ad-hoc UI decisions without guidance.

### Recommended Next Steps

1. **Create Architecture Document** — Define Rust backend modules, React frontend components, data flow, AI abstraction layer, cross-platform build strategy, state management, and file-based storage approach. Map architecture components to FRs/NFRs.

2. **Create UX Design Document** — Wireframes for Card Grid and List View, visual status language, privacy indicator component, settings panels, system tray menus, error/empty states. Validate against user journeys.

3. **Create Epics & Stories** — Break the 46 FRs into user-value epics with independently completable stories. Ensure epic independence, no forward dependencies, and full FR coverage. Use the remediation guidance in this report as starting point.

4. **Re-run Implementation Readiness** — After creating the three missing artifacts, re-run this assessment to validate complete coverage.

### What's Working Well

The PRD is the strongest artifact in the project:
- **46 FRs** are all testable, implementation-agnostic, and clearly scoped
- **27 NFRs** have specific measurable targets
- **4 user journeys** provide narrative context that bridges vision and requirements
- **Phased roadmap** with clear must-have vs nice-to-have prioritization
- **Risk mitigation** covers technical, market, and resource dimensions
- **Innovation validation** methods are defined for each differentiator

This PRD provides an excellent foundation. The missing artifacts are downstream work that should flow naturally from this quality baseline.

### Final Note

This assessment identified **3 missing artifacts** (Architecture, UX Design, Epics & Stories) that are prerequisites for implementation. The PRD itself is production-quality — the gaps are in downstream planning, not in requirements definition. Address the three missing artifacts in sequence (Architecture → UX → Epics), then re-assess.

---

**Assessment completed:** 2025-04-25
**Assessor:** Implementation Readiness Workflow
**Report:** `implementation-readiness-report-2025-04-25.md`
