fix: update masonry grid sizing logic and notebook list padding
This commit is contained in:
Sepehr Ramezani
@@ -2,10 +2,9 @@
|
||||
name: 'step-01-understand'
|
||||
description: 'Analyze the requirement delta between current state and what user wants to build'
|
||||
|
||||
workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/create-tech-spec'
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-02-investigate.md'
|
||||
skipToStepFile: './step-03-generate.md'
|
||||
templateFile: '{workflow_path}/tech-spec-template.md'
|
||||
templateFile: '../tech-spec-template.md'
|
||||
wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-wip.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -47,20 +46,20 @@ Hey {user_name}! Found a tech-spec in progress:
|
||||
|
||||
Is this what you're here to continue?
|
||||
|
||||
[y] Yes, pick up where I left off
|
||||
[n] No, archive it and start something new
|
||||
[Y] Yes, pick up where I left off
|
||||
[N] No, archive it and start something new
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
a) **Menu Handling:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **[y] Continue existing:**
|
||||
- **[Y] Continue existing:**
|
||||
- Jump directly to the appropriate step based on `stepsCompleted`:
|
||||
- `[1]` → Load `{nextStepFile}` (Step 2)
|
||||
- `[1, 2]` → Load `{skipToStepFile}` (Step 3)
|
||||
- `[1, 2, 3]` → Load `./step-04-review.md` (Step 4)
|
||||
- **[n] Archive and start fresh:**
|
||||
- **[N] Archive and start fresh:**
|
||||
- Rename `{wipFile}` to `{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-{slug}-archived-{date}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Greet and Ask for Initial Request
|
||||
@@ -162,19 +161,22 @@ b) **Report to user:**
|
||||
|
||||
a) **Display menu:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[a] Advanced Elicitation - dig deeper into requirements
|
||||
[c] Continue - proceed to next step
|
||||
[p] Party Mode - bring in other experts
|
||||
```
|
||||
Display: "**Select:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Deep Investigation (Step 2 of 4)"
|
||||
|
||||
b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling:
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- **[a]**: Load and execute `{advanced_elicitation}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- **[c]**: Load and execute `{nextStepFile}` (Map Technical Constraints)
|
||||
- **[p]**: Load and execute `{party_mode_exec}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF A: Read fully and follow: `{advanced_elicitation}` with current tech-spec content, process enhanced insights, ask user "Accept improvements? (y/n)", if yes update WIP file then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF P: Read fully and follow: `{party_mode_exec}` with current tech-spec content, process collaborative insights, ask user "Accept changes? (y/n)", if yes update WIP file then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF C: Verify `{wipFile}` has `stepsCompleted: [1]`, then read fully and follow: `{nextStepFile}`
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: respond helpfully then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After A or P execution, return to this menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -186,4 +188,4 @@ b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] WIP check performed FIRST before any greeting.
|
||||
- [ ] `{wipFile}` created with correct frontmatter, Overview, Context for Development, and `stepsCompleted: [1]`.
|
||||
- [ ] User selected [c] to continue.
|
||||
- [ ] User selected [C] to continue.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
|
||||
name: 'step-02-investigate'
|
||||
description: 'Map technical constraints and anchor points within the codebase'
|
||||
|
||||
workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/create-tech-spec'
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-03-generate.md'
|
||||
wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-wip.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -115,21 +114,22 @@ Fill in:
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present Checkpoint Menu
|
||||
|
||||
**Display menu:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[a] Advanced Elicitation - explore more context
|
||||
[c] Continue - proceed to Generate Spec
|
||||
[p] Party Mode - bring in other experts
|
||||
```
|
||||
Display: "**Select:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Generate Spec (Step 3 of 4)"
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling:
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- **[a]**: Load and execute `{advanced_elicitation}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- **[c]**: Verify frontmatter updated with `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`, then load and execute `{nextStepFile}`
|
||||
- **[p]**: Load and execute `{party_mode_exec}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF A: Read fully and follow: `{advanced_elicitation}` with current tech-spec content, process enhanced insights, ask user "Accept improvements? (y/n)", if yes update WIP file then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF P: Read fully and follow: `{party_mode_exec}` with current tech-spec content, process collaborative insights, ask user "Accept changes? (y/n)", if yes update WIP file then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF C: Verify frontmatter updated with `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`, then read fully and follow: `{nextStepFile}`
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: respond helpfully then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After A or P execution, return to this menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
|
||||
name: 'step-03-generate'
|
||||
description: 'Build the implementation plan based on the technical mapping of constraints'
|
||||
|
||||
workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/create-tech-spec'
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-04-review.md'
|
||||
wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-wip.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -114,7 +113,7 @@ stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
c) **Load and execute `{nextStepFile}` (Step 4)**
|
||||
c) **Read fully and follow: `{nextStepFile}` (Step 4)**
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUIRED OUTPUTS:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
|
||||
name: 'step-04-review'
|
||||
description: 'Review and finalize the tech-spec'
|
||||
|
||||
workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec'
|
||||
wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-wip.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,9 +38,28 @@ wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/tech-spec-wip.md'
|
||||
|
||||
- {task_count} tasks to implement
|
||||
- {ac_count} acceptance criteria to verify
|
||||
- {files_count} files to modify
|
||||
- {files_count} files to modify"
|
||||
|
||||
Does this capture your intent? Any changes needed?"
|
||||
**Present review menu:**
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Select:** [C] Continue [E] Edit [Q] Questions [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode"
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF C: Proceed to Section 3 (Finalize the Spec)
|
||||
- IF E: Proceed to Section 2 (Handle Review Feedback), then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF Q: Answer questions, then redisplay this menu
|
||||
- IF A: Read fully and follow: `{advanced_elicitation}` with current spec content, process enhanced insights, ask user "Accept improvements? (y/n)", if yes update spec then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF P: Read fully and follow: `{party_mode_exec}` with current spec content, process collaborative insights, ask user "Accept changes? (y/n)", if yes update spec then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: respond helpfully then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to finalize when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Handle Review Feedback
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -96,11 +114,11 @@ Saved to: {finalFile}
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
[a] Advanced Elicitation - refine further
|
||||
[r] Adversarial Review - critique of the spec (highly recommended)
|
||||
[b] Begin Development - start implementing now (not recommended)
|
||||
[d] Done - exit workflow
|
||||
[p] Party Mode - get expert feedback before dev
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - refine further
|
||||
[R] Adversarial Review - critique of the spec (highly recommended)
|
||||
[B] Begin Development - start implementing now (not recommended)
|
||||
[D] Done - exit workflow
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - get expert feedback before dev
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -117,17 +135,26 @@ This ensures the dev agent has clean context focused solely on implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling:
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- **[a]**: Load and execute `{advanced_elicitation}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- **[b]**: Load and execute `{quick_dev_workflow}` with the final spec file (warn: fresh context is better)
|
||||
- **[d]**: Exit workflow - display final confirmation and path to spec
|
||||
- **[p]**: Load and execute `{party_mode_exec}`, then return here and redisplay menu
|
||||
- **[r]**: Execute Adversarial Review:
|
||||
1. **Invoke Adversarial Review Task**:
|
||||
> With `{finalFile}` constructed, invoke the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: run this task, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{finalFile}`.
|
||||
- IF A: Read fully and follow: `{advanced_elicitation}` with current spec content, process enhanced insights, ask user "Accept improvements? (y/n)", if yes update spec then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF B: Read the entire workflow file at `{quick_dev_workflow}` and follow the instructions with the final spec file (warn: fresh context is better)
|
||||
- IF D: Exit workflow - display final confirmation and path to spec
|
||||
- IF P: Read fully and follow: `{party_mode_exec}` with current spec content, process collaborative insights, ask user "Accept changes? (y/n)", if yes update spec then redisplay menu, if no keep original then redisplay menu
|
||||
- IF R: Execute Adversarial Review (see below)
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: respond helpfully then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- After A, P, or R execution, return to this menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### Adversarial Review [R] Process:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Invoke Adversarial Review Task**:
|
||||
> With `{finalFile}` constructed, load and follow the review task. If possible, use information asymmetry: load this task, and only it, in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{finalFile}`.
|
||||
<invoke-task>Review {finalFile} using {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml</invoke-task>
|
||||
> **Platform fallback:** If task invocation not available, load the task file and execute its instructions inline, passing `{finalFile}` as the content.
|
||||
> **Platform fallback:** If task invocation not available, load the task file and follow its instructions inline, passing `{finalFile}` as the content.
|
||||
> The task should: review `{finalFile}` and return a list of findings.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Process Findings**:
|
||||
@@ -143,7 +170,7 @@ b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Exit Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**When user selects [d]:**
|
||||
**When user selects [D]:**
|
||||
|
||||
"**All done!** Your tech-spec is ready at:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user