**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output. **Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents. **Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}` **Coaching stance:** Be direct and honest — the verdict exists to surface truth, not to soften it. But frame every finding constructively. # Stage 5: The Verdict **Goal:** Step back from the details and give the user an honest assessment of where their concept stands. Finalize the PRFAQ document and produce the downstream distillate. ## The Assessment Review the entire PRFAQ — press release, customer FAQ, internal FAQ — and deliver a candid verdict: **Concept Strength:** Rate the overall concept readiness. Not a score — a narrative assessment. Where is the thinking sharp and where is it still soft? What survived the gauntlet and what barely held together? **Three categories of findings:** - **Forged in steel** — aspects of the concept that are clear, compelling, and defensible. The press release sections that would actually make a customer stop. The FAQ answers that are honest and convincing. - **Needs more heat** — areas that are promising but underdeveloped. The user has a direction but hasn't gone deep enough. These need more work before they're ready for a PRD. - **Cracks in the foundation** — genuine risks, unresolved contradictions, or gaps that could undermine the whole concept. Not necessarily deal-breakers, but things that must be addressed deliberately. **Present the verdict directly.** Don't soften it. The whole point of this process is to surface truth before committing resources. But frame findings constructively — for every crack, suggest what it would take to address it. ## Finalize the Document 1. **Polish the PRFAQ** — ensure the press release reads as a cohesive narrative, FAQs flow logically, formatting is consistent 2. **Append The Verdict section** to the output document with the assessment 3. Update frontmatter: `status: "complete"`, `stage: 5`, `updated` timestamp ## Produce the Distillate Throughout the process, you captured context beyond what fits in the PRFAQ. Source material for the distillate includes the `` blocks in the output document (which survive context compaction) as well as anything remaining in session memory — rejected framings, alternative positioning, technical constraints, competitive intelligence, scope signals, resource estimates, open questions. **Always produce the distillate** at `{planning_artifacts}/prfaq-{project_name}-distillate.md`: ```yaml --- title: "PRFAQ Distillate: {project_name}" type: llm-distillate source: "prfaq-{project_name}.md" created: "{timestamp}" purpose: "Token-efficient context for downstream PRD creation" --- ``` **Distillate content:** Dense bullet points grouped by theme. Each bullet stands alone with enough context for a downstream LLM to use it. Include: - Rejected framings and why they were dropped - Requirements signals captured during coaching - Technical context, constraints, and platform preferences - Competitive intelligence from discussion - Open questions and unknowns flagged during internal FAQ - Scope signals — what's in, out, and maybe for MVP - Resource and timeline estimates discussed - The Verdict findings (especially "needs more heat" and "cracks") as actionable items ## Present Completion "Your PRFAQ for {project_name} has survived the gauntlet. **PRFAQ:** `{planning_artifacts}/prfaq-{project_name}.md` **Detail Pack:** `{planning_artifacts}/prfaq-{project_name}-distillate.md` **Recommended next step:** Use the PRFAQ and detail pack as input for PRD creation. The PRFAQ replaces the product brief in your planning pipeline — tell your PM 'create a PRD' and point them to these files." **Headless mode output:** ```json { "status": "complete", "prfaq": "{planning_artifacts}/prfaq-{project_name}.md", "distillate": "{planning_artifacts}/prfaq-{project_name}-distillate.md", "verdict": "forged|needs-heat|cracked", "key_risks": ["top unresolved items"], "open_questions": ["unresolved items from FAQs"] } ``` ## Stage Complete This is the terminal stage. If the user wants to revise, loop back to the relevant stage. Otherwise, the workflow is done.