Features: - BMAD (Build Modular AI-driven Development) framework setup - BMM, BMB, CIS, Core modules configured - Story 1.1: Component trait with error handling - Workspace Cargo.toml with components crate - 31 tests passing (19 unit + 12 doc tests) Technical: - Component trait with compute_residuals, jacobian_entries, n_equations - ComponentError enum with thiserror - JacobianBuilder for sparse matrix construction - Object-safe trait supporting Box<dyn Component> - Comprehensive documentation and examples
3.7 KiB
| name | description | editPlan | criticalActions | agentEdit | advancedElicitationTask | partyModeWorkflow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e-07-activation | Review critical_actions and route to edit step | {bmb_creations_output_folder}/edit-plan-{agent-name}.md | ../data/critical-actions.md | ./e-08-edit-agent.md | {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml | {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md |
Edit Step 7: Activation and Routing
STEP GOAL:
Review critical_actions and route to the agent edit step based on hasSidecar value.
MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES:
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: Load criticalActions and editPlan first
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Load criticalActions.md before discussing activation
- 📊 Determine hasSidecar for routing
- 💬 Route based on POST-EDIT hasSidecar value
EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Load criticalActions.md
- 📊 Check editPlan for target hasSidecar value
- 💾 Route to agent edit step
- ➡️ Auto-advance to edit step on [C]
MANDATORY SEQUENCE
CRITICAL: Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
1. Load Reference Documents
Read {criticalActions} and {editPlan} to understand:
- Current critical_actions (if any)
- Target hasSidecar value after edits
2. Review Critical Actions
If user wants to add/modify critical_actions:
- Reference patterns from criticalActions.md
- Define action name, description, invocation
- For hasSidecar: true — specify sidecar-folder and file paths
3. Determine Routing
Check {editPlan} for agent metadata (hasSidecar):
# Simple routing based on hasSidecar
hasSidecar: true → route to e-08-edit-agent.md (create sidecar structure)
hasSidecar: false → route to e-08-edit-agent.md (single YAML file)
The edit step handles both cases based on hasSidecar value.
4. Document to Edit Plan
Append to {editPlan}:
activationEdits:
criticalActions:
additions: []
modifications: []
routing:
destinationEdit: e-08-edit-agent.md
hasSidecar: {true|false} # Derived from edit plan
5. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display: "Select an Option: [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Edit Agent"
Menu Handling Logic:
- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}, and when finished redisplay the menu
- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}, and when finished redisplay the menu
- IF C: Save to {editPlan}, then only then load and execute the agent edit step
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then Redisplay Menu Options
EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
This is the ROUTING HUB for edit flow. ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [routing determined], load and execute the agent edit step:
- hasSidecar: false → Single YAML file edit
- hasSidecar: true → YAML + sidecar folder structure edit
🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
✅ SUCCESS:
- criticalActions.md loaded
- Routing determined based on hasSidecar
- Edit plan updated with routing info
❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Proceeded without loading reference documents
- Routing not determined
- Wrong edit step selected
Master Rule: Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.